Verified Document

Materialistic Teenagers Are Materialistic Teenagers Less Motivated Article Review

Materialistic Teenagers Are Materialistic Teenagers Less Motivated to Learn? Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from the United Kingdom and Hong Kong

The paper will analyze a paper that focuses on the behavior of materialistic teenagers, as the findings and the conclusion of the paper will help in adding knowledge in the field of clinical psychology. The study "Are Materialistic Teenagers Less Motivated to Learn? Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence From the United Kingdom and Hong Kong" written by Lisbeth Ku, Helga Dittmar and Robin Banerjee in the year 2012 has focused on the behaviors of materialistic teenagers and the effects of materialism on the learning behavior.

Beginning of the study is strong as many facts in relation to the topic have been given. It has been reported that within the period of three decades, there has been an increase of more than 20% students from UK and Hong Kong who believe that the university education can help in increasing earning capacity of the individuals. This fact seems to be favored and supported at the government level as well. UK government released a report on higher education where the ability of universities in increasing earning power was discussed. The second important fact that has been mentioned in the study is that with the belief that the university education increases earning power decreases their interest in learning. Thereby here it can be added that materialistic orientations of the students is negatively related to the learning outcomes....

The beginning of the study has many questions that are to be answered in the coming sections. Firstly, if the relationship between materialistic orientation of the students and learning outcomes can be applied on students of all educational levels. Second, if there is any involvement of psychologies in relationship between materialism and learning orientation of the students. Third important question is in relation to the factors that are involved in reduced performance of materialistic students in the schools. Fourth important question is in relation to the direction of linkage between materialistic orientation and lesser educational performance of the materialistic students in schools (Watson, 2003, p. 723).
An important fact that needs to be mentioned here is that theoretical approach has been used in the paper that discusses the given issue in more detail. The study has firstly defined in detail the term materialism, In reference to many authors who have conducted studies on the same topic. The section has mentioned that there are two main modes with the help of which the questions in the study are to be answered. These include social motives and materialistic motives involved in reduced educational performance of the students (Watson, 2003, p. 730). Social motives in these cases have been defined by the presence of materialistic cues and money that can define and enhance status and reputation of a student. Materialism on the other hand has been defined as an important aim and goal in life that can help…

Sources used in this document:
References

Ku, L., Dittmar, H., and Banerjee, R. (2012). Are Materialistic Teenagers Less Motivated to Learn? Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence from the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, pp. 74 -- 86.

Watson, J.J. (2003). The relationship of materialism to spending tendencies, saving and debt. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 723 -- 739.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now